This much I know about…The Sutton Trust/EEF Toolkit and the Golden Thread from evidence to student outcomes, via deliberate intervention

I have been a teacher for 26 years, a Headteacher for 11 years and, at the age of 50, this much I know about The Sutton Trust/EEF Toolkit and the Golden Thread from evidence to student outcomes, via deliberate intervention.

Golden_thread1

Can evidence really inform practice so that student outcomes improve? The go-to source of evidence about effective interventions is the The Sutton Trust/EEF Teaching and Learning Toolkit. What follows is a tale which illustrates the Golden Thread from evidence to student outcomes, via deliberate intervention.

 Crim-Grad-Class-51707D51pf

Interventions to help students learn can be done for next to nothing. The Sutton Trust-Education Endowment Foundation Learning Toolkit rates Meta-cognition & self-regulation as a cheap and highly effective strategy to improve students’ learning.

How do students learn how to train their brain to operate effectively during the 90 minutes of an AS level examination? Like many people, my students’ AS mock examination results were pretty disappointing. I know they know their economics theory, but under examination conditions they do not seem to have a sharp enough grasp of how to respond effectively to score as many marks as possible. Command words are ignored; diagrams are left unlabelled; answers are expressed carelessly. On the evidence within their examination papers, my students’ powers of meta-cognition & self-regulation in the examination room are modest at best. Instead of despairing, I thought hard about what to do next…

Modelling thinking so that students’ learning improves is a challenge. What I did in response to my students’ AS mock examination results was model for them explicitly my own thinking, something I had never done before. I completed the same examination paper, not answering the questions but writing on the paper what my brain would have been saying to itself, question by question, should I have attempted the paper. I then talked them through the pdf, showing them just how alert and alive my brain is when I am being examined, teaching them how to think about their own learning more explicitly.

 

What makes great teaching? According to Professor Rob Coe et al, great teaching is defined as that which leads to improved student progress. Well, explicit modelling/teaching of examination room meta-cognition and self-regulation skills might just be the teaching and learning strategy I’ve been searching for these past twenty-six years. The students who have re-sat the AS Economics examination because they attained a U grade first time round have all improved by three or more grades. The one student who I know for sure improved precisely because of his use of the meta-cognition and self-regulation intervention I modelled for him is Oliver. He went from getting 24/60 and a grade U in his first paper to getting 51/60 and a grade A in his second paper, a completely different paper to the original mock (and I only gave him 30 minutes’ notice before he sat the re-take paper).

Why am I so sure it was the intervention which helped Oliver improve? Well look at how he has made explicit on paper his mental checklist for ensuring he completed the question thoroughly.

Ollie annotations

The Golden Thread: Professor Steve Higgins,  Professor Rob Coe and Dr Lee Elliot Major write The Sutton Trust  Teaching and Learning Toolkit – the Education Endowment Foundation become co-authors of the Toolkit – our school starts reading the Toolkit and we begin thinking harder about how we develop our classroom practice – we appoint a Research Lead, Alex Quigley, in our drive to become an evidence-based school and begin working with the EEF – Oliver does badly in his mock exam and our baseline data before my pedagogic intervention is his mock result – I remember what the Toolkit says about meta-cognition and self-regulation because Alex keeps research in the forefront of our thinking about pedagogy – I devise my intervention and implement it – Oliver recognises how the intervention might help his performance and consciously changes his behaviour in his re-take examination – Oliver improves by 27 marks and five grades. Go figure…

 

 

 

About johntomsett

Headteacher in York. All views are my own.
This entry was posted in Teaching and Learning. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to This much I know about…The Sutton Trust/EEF Toolkit and the Golden Thread from evidence to student outcomes, via deliberate intervention

  1. chrishildrew says:

    Reblogged this on #Echewcation and commented:
    One for the metacognition group!

  2. Daniel J. Ayres says:

    Reblogged this on Education Web Gems.

  3. Pingback: ORRsome blog posts February 2015 | high heels and high notes

  4. Pingback: Meta-Cognition: What I am thinking about in an exam | WHAT SEEMS TO WORK AT QE

  5. Pingback: A Brief Follow Up on Meta-Cognition | WHAT SEEMS TO WORK AT QE

  6. rgslearning says:

    Reblogged this on RGS Learning and commented:
    Blog of the Week – John Tomsett on Modelling Thinking for Revision

  7. Pingback: This much I know about...The Sutton Trust/EEF T...

  8. Dave Rankin says:

    Seems to be making a real difference. I have been doing this for a while now by producing videos of my own answers on pdf in real time. I play the videos back to the class whilst vocalising my thought processes. Next step is to properly evaluate!

  9. Anon says:

    What is the control? What other work did he do? It’s not clear that this intervention is responsible for the grade change. Most pupils improve after a terrible mock result even if you do nothing.

  10. Pingback: This much I know about…what REALLY WORKS when preparing students for their examinations! | johntomsett

  11. Pingback: Revision and Research | Little Miss Lud

  12. Pingback: English A-Level and meta-cognition | @Miss_Tiggr

  13. Reblogged this on Time-Travelling Teacher and commented:
    I’ve just discovered this blog and it really resonates with my reading right now.

  14. Pingback: Might ‘humble research’ fit the evidence informed agenda? by Liz Samuel | QKS Learning

  15. Pingback: IT excitement | Doing The Business

  16. Pingback: This much I know about…the importance of reciprocal vulnerability | johntomsett

  17. Pingback: Practical Pedagogies Conference – Day 2 – blog. mrstacey. org.uk

  18. Pingback: #Nurture1516 | teachhistory21

  19. Pingback: That was 2015… | Class Teaching

  20. Pingback: Journal Club | ndhsblogspot

  21. Pingback: Towards excellence: Modelling and Metacognition –

  22. Pingback: Ten teaching techniques to practise – deliberately. | teacherhead

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s