This much I know about…a new concept of headship in a MAT-centric school-led system

I have been a teacher for 28 years, a Headteacher for 13 years and, at the age of 52, this much I know about a new concept of headship in a MAT-centric school-led system.

An ego-free Headteacher is a rare beast. To be a Headteacher you need to have a certain self-confidence. If you are going to be in charge, you need self-belief in spades. And a new Headteacher usually assumes that he has to come into a school and make his mark. Schools are notoriously vulnerable in the wake of regime change. A new Headteacher can lead to a significant modification of the values and educational philosophy of a school. And perfectly good systems are suddenly abandoned for the new boss’ favoured alternatives, without a shred of evidence that in his new setting his old favourites will work. So, out goes setting, in comes mixed ability; goodbye SIMS, hello BromCom; exit Year Groups, enter Houses. And the rest of the staff just have to suck it up and watch whilst what worked stops working…

A Headteacher often has an inordinate impact upon the school he leads. The opposite is true at Toyota, one of the most successful companies over the past three decades. In their brilliant book, Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths and Total Nonsense, Pfeffer and Sutton point out that Toyota’s success stems from its great systems, not stunning individual talent…one study showed that Toyota was the only major automobile company where a change in the CEO had no effect on performance. The systems are so robust that changing CEOs at Toyota is a lot like changing lightbulbs; there is little noticeable effect between the old one and the new one. In the world of a MAT-centric school-led system, maybe there is something we can learn from Toyota, where its robust set of interrelated management practices and philosophies…provide advantage above and beyond the ideas or inspirations of single individuals?

How many Headteachers want to give up their decision-making powers? Headteachers whose schools join a MAT have to give up a certain level of power over the decision-making process, and anyone who claims any different is not being completely honest. Selecting one Headteacher to be the CEO of a new MAT inevitably leads to the other Headteachers feeling their authority is undermined. No wonder the DfE is outlawing the practice and insisting that Trust Boards are Headteacher-free zones. If we are going to create a new school system in England then we have to accept a different concept of headship, one which has Toyota-like features.

People like me need to get over ourselves. Schools which have lasted centuries have always been based upon a set of educational values, enshrined in a Founding Charter. Imagine creating a MAT whose Founding Charter was so firmly established that what the founding members believe about how students should be educated shapes the direction of the school decades, even centuries, into the future. A new Headteacher appointed to lead a school within such a MAT would be employed to be the guardian of the MAT’s/school’s educational philosophy and values-system, rather than someone given liberty to take the school in a quite different direction. Headteachers like me would come and go, but what matters – the education of children – would survive us all.

rcn-resolve-conflict-istock_000028612518small

About johntomsett

Headteacher in York. All views are my own.
This entry was posted in General educational issues, School Leadership. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to This much I know about…a new concept of headship in a MAT-centric school-led system

  1. ijstock says:

    Oh for more head teachers with that perspective…

  2. Brian says:

    What a fascinating and thought provoking post.

    Some interesting points made about an incoming head and the changes they might make. Some interesting issues raised about leadership and organisational success.

    I am not an expert on MATs and as I no longer teach in the UK I do not come into daily contact with discussions around such.

    I have to agree that there is a sense in which consistency and longevity should pervade an educational organisation however I do also wonder whether MATs are a particualr case due to their size and scope. Surely there is a place for Toyota culture/management style but there is also surely a place for the Lamborghini approach which brings style, innovation and individualism to a system which cannot endure without pruning and regrowth

    Just as there are different forms of business organisations and not for profits,there should be different forms of educational organisations, some more traditional and some more progressive. Oh no, now I have gone and done it, I have gone and introduced that old chestnut.

    Have a great xmas

  3. MAT centred leadership has the possibility to give head teachers, principals, pedagogical emperors or whatever the lead educator is called next the chance to focus more on children and staff rather than the ephemera of headship. Freed from managing drains and telephone system contracts instead doing more of what they are trained to do (education) could this be a dawn of a better organised education system? Balanced with that can some cope with the loss of “power” to others?
    As its said “may you live in interesting times”.

    • Stevie D says:

      Apart from in tiny primary schools, why are there headteachers who are still worrying about stuff like drains and telephone contracts? That’s what business managers are for, to manage the business side of the school (the clue is in the name!), leaving the headteacher free to head up the teaching side of the school (again, the clue is in the name!). Pretending that this is something that can only be achieved through academies and trusts is nonsense, good schools have been doing that for years.

  4. R Walsh says:

    I’m presuming you mean he/she when referring to the headteacher.

  5. andreacarr1 says:

    As CoG at a school facing MATification this is really good to read and I will be sharing with colleagues. These are precisely the issues we have been wrestling with. Can you point me to more on the DfE outlawing HTs on MAT boards? I’ve heard rumours but not seen anything more definitive. Thanks John.

  6. Tony Hewitt says:

    Well said John. The whole government led drive for MATS has flaws only great leadership can cure….it’s deck chairs on the Titanic time AGAIN!

  7. Pingback: What I am learning about the emerging system | Ros McMullen: Things I've learned and things I'm learning

  8. Kevin Moody says:

    Leadership is action not title . Spot on John . Let’s hope for a better 2017 !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s