I have been a teacher for 29 years, a Headteacher for 14 years and, at the age of 53, this much I know about overcoming my prejudices to the benefit of my students
Multiple choice questions have always been abhorrent to me. My prejudice against MCQs is both instinctual and ideological, I think. I have forever associated MCQs with a functional approach to education. What use would a liberal like me ever have for the A, B, C or D approach to teaching and learning?
The root of my prejudice is, like all prejudices, ignorance. The most influential book I have read this year has been Daisy Christodoulou’s Making Good Progress. It clarified the complexities of assessment for me. After reading Daisy’s book I felt slightly ashamed that it had taken nearly three decades of teaching before I understood how assessment undergirds the teaching and learning process. I recommended the book to our curriculum lead and he has been working with subject leaders over the past few months as we implement Daisy’s key recommendations; one of our central development strands this year is to ensure the coherence of assessment, curriculum and pedagogy.
I like listening to experts. Despite the expertise we have on our staff, we decided to invite Daisy in to speak to colleagues at the beginning of term. During her presentation she convinced me of the efficacy of MCQs. Teaching the new Economics A level specification has presented me with the challenge of ensuring students have learnt more complex, deeper content. Daisy illustrated how MCQs can help me formatively assess my students’ knowledge base as we build towards answering a summative end of topic examination question. Three weeks into term I set my first MCQ test:
The results have been hugely useful. I have been able to assess which elements of what I have taught have not been learnt securely by the students. Before half term, we need to return to the market for loanable funds and quantity theory because 80% of the students failed to answer those MCQs correctly. One student said she had “enjoyed” the MCQ test and found it “really useful”. This form of formative assessment is both accurate and time-efficient.
Writing effective MCQs is not easy. Good MCQs will test students’ knowledge and understanding of your subject; bad MCQs will test their powers of elimination. You have to make sure you include a few distractors, which are plausible but quite clearly wrong.
Every school needs someone who can help you access the evidence-base. Alex Quigley, our Director of Research School, sent me an email yesterday with me some extra reading on MCQs; there is some great advice here if you are already an MCQ writer or you fancy having a crack at writing some MCQs in the future:
A great brief guide can be found here.
‘A review of multiple choice item-writing for classroom assessment’ is available here.
A general guide for teachers on test writing, with a great section on MCQs can be accessed here.
Leading an evidence-informed national Research School means defeating your own prejudices. If you would like to know more about Research Schools and want to hear some influential speakers discuss how evidence-informed approaches can aid school improvement, then why not attend the forthcoming Evidence In Education: Northern Networks Making It Work conference at the University of York. You can find more details and book a place here.